Search on : Taxa descriptions

 


   
Literature:
 
Page number:1273 
Remarks (public):Sarcodontia agrees in some respects with Radulodon (shape of basidia and spores, presence of clamps, thickness of spore wall) but differs in the nature of the subicular hyphae and in the presence of yellow pigment. This does not turn red in KOH as it does in e.g. Mycoacia uda. The genus was by Nikolajeva (1961 p. 174- ) joined with Mycoacia, but from this genus it is well distinguished, e.g. by the nature of the basal hyphae and by the thickened spore wall. Thus, Sarcodontia seems to be monotypic.
The term monomitic does literally mean one kind of hyphae, which is not in the case of Sarcodontia as there are really two kinds, the thin-walled and the thick-walled ones. It is, however, not dimitic in the original sense. The terminology does not always cover the reality as to the nature of the hyphae.
 
Description type:Non-original description 
Description:Sarcodontia Schulzer in Schulzer, Kanitz et Knapp, Verh. Zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 16 p. 41, 1866; Donk, Mycologia 44 p. 262-263, 1952.-Oxyodontia l.W. Miller, Mycologia 25 p. 294, 1933.
Type species of Sarcodontia: S. mali Schulzer of Oxyodontia: Hydnum setosum Pers.
Fruitbody resupinate or on vertical substrate forming nodes with fertile undersides; hymenophore of long, conical aculei; the whole fungus (incl. sterile mycelium) from the beginning yellow; hymenophore in the living state ceraceous, when dried rather hard; hyphal system monomitic, all
hyphae with clamps, generative hyphae thin-walled, subicular hyphae very thick-walled; no cystidia; basidia clavate, often sinuous or constricted, with 4 ster.; spores ellipsoid-subglobose, ab. 5 µm long, with thickened walls, not amyloid, not cyanophilous.
 
Taxon name: